WebRTC enables amazing things. Real-time communication. Direct connections. Low latency.

But when it breaks? Oh boy, does it break spectacularly.

Here are real stories of WebRTC implementations gone wrong and the expensive lessons learned.

The startup that burned $50K in a week

2019. Small startup. Building video chat for online therapy. Thought they understood WebRTC. They didn't.

The mistake: No TURN server. Assumed direct connections would "just work."

What happened:

• Launched to 500 therapists
• 30% couldn't connect to clients
• Corporate firewalls blocked everything
• Therapists complained
• Clients left bad reviews
• PR disaster

The scramble: Rushed to add TURN server. Used first service they found. Didn't check pricing.

The horror: TURN server charged per GB. 30% of 500 therapists = 150 connections through relay. High-quality video. Running 24/7.

Week 1 bill: $12,000 Week 2 bill: $18,500 Week 3 bill: $23,000

By week 4: Startup nearly bankrupt. Had to shut down temporarily. Renegotiate pricing. Lost most customers.

Lesson learned: Always plan for TURN servers. Always check pricing. Test with representative network conditions.

What they should've done: Run own TURN server. Would've cost $200/month instead of $50K.

Current status: Company survived, barely. Now obsessive about infrastructure costs.

The conference call that became a horror movie

2020, early pandemic. Company doing all-hands meeting. 500 employees. Custom WebRTC solution built by overconfident intern.

The setup: Everyone joins video call. Simple, right?

The architecture: Everyone connected to everyone. Full mesh. 500 peer connections per person.

The math:

• 500 people × 499 connections each
• 249,500 total connections
• Each sending video to everyone
• Catastrophic bandwidth

What actually happened:

First 50 people: "This is great!"

100 people: "Getting a bit laggy..."

200 people: Computers catching fire (metaphorically)

300 people: Mass disconnections. Chaos. Frozen screens.

CEO trying to give important announcement: Talking to void. Nobody can hear. Video frozen mid-sentence.

The memes: Screenshot of CEO's frozen face became company meme for years.

Emergency response: Canceled meeting. Sent email instead. Very embarrassing.

The fix: Hired actual WebRTC expert. Implemented SFU (Selective Forwarding Unit). Proper architecture.

Lesson learned: Mesh networks don't scale beyond ~10 people. Need proper architecture for scale.

Intern's fate: Actually got hired full-time. Company appreciated learning opportunity. (And eternal mockery.)

The dating app privacy nightmare

2021. Video dating app. WebRTC for video calls between matches. Thought they were being clever.

The "clever" idea: Direct peer-to-peer. Users' IPs hidden for privacy.

The problem they forgot: WebRTC requires ICE candidates. ICE candidates contain IP addresses.

What went wrong:

Week 1: User reports "someone showed up at my house after video date."

Investigation: Creep used video date to get victim's IP address. Looked up address. Showed up.

Panic: Company realizes WebRTC exposes IPs. That's how it works. Can't hide it without relay.

Attempted fix: Forced all connections through TURN relay. Hid IPs.

New problem: Latency increased. Video quality suffered. Users complained.

Catch-22: Privacy vs. performance. Can't have both with simple WebRTC.

Final solution: Hybrid approach. Initial connection through relay. Once matched and trusted, can opt-in to direct connection.

Legal consequences: Lawsuits. Settlements. Regulatory investigation. Bad press.

Lesson learned: Security/privacy requires thinking through whole system. Technical features have real-world safety implications.

What they should've done: Consult security expert before launch. Test privacy implications. Have legal review.

The remote exam that became a cheating paradise

2020. University. Online exams with video proctoring. WebRTC for monitoring students.

The idea: Students share screen and webcam. Proctors watch for cheating.

The oversight: Proctors watching from central server. Students' connections visible to each other.

The exploit students found:

Step 1: Connect to exam

Step 2: Check network connections (developer tools)

Step 3: See all other students' IP addresses

Step 4: Connect directly to other students

Step 5: Share answers via direct connection

The beautiful irony: Using the anti-cheating system TO cheat.

How it was discovered: Too many perfect scores. Similar wrong answers. Investigation revealed exploit.

University's response: Emergency exam cancellation. Redo all exams. New system. Very expensive.

Students' defense: "If the system lets us, is it really cheating?" (Yes. Yes it is.)

Lesson learned: WebRTC creates peer connections. In group settings, that means peers can see each other. Design accordingly.

Better approach: Star topology. Everyone connects to server, not each other.

The telemedicine HIPAA violation

2020. Small clinic. Launched telemedicine using "simple WebRTC library." Seemed fine.

What they didn't know: Library logged all connections to developer's server for debugging.

The problem: Logs contained patient information. IP addresses. Connection times. Session durations.

HIPAA reality: That's patient data. Sharing with third party without authorization = violation.

How it was discovered: Patient's lawyer reviewing privacy notices. Asked where data went. Clinic had no idea.

Investigation revealed: Year of patient data on random developer's server. In plain text. Unencrypted.

The consequences:

• HIPAA violation fines: $250,000
• Legal settlements: $500,000
• Lost credibility: Priceless
• Clinic nearly closed

Lesson learned: Read the documentation. Know what libraries do. HIPAA doesn't care about "we didn't know."

What they should've done: Legal review. Security audit. Self-hosted solution. Proper logging controls.

The IoT security camera disaster

2021. Startup. "Privacy-focused" security cameras using WebRTC. No cloud storage. Direct to your phone.

The marketing: "Your video never leaves your home!"

The reality: Bad implementation. Default passwords. No authentication on signaling server.

What hackers discovered: Could connect to ANY camera if you knew the camera ID. IDs were sequential. Easy to guess.

The breach:

Day 1: Hacker posts proof-of-concept

Day 2: Script kiddies start accessing random cameras

Day 3: Private moments posted online

Day 4: News outlets reporting "privacy camera exposes users"

Day 5: Company going out of business

The irony: Marketed as more private than cloud cameras. Actually less secure.

Victims: Families who trusted "privacy-focused" marketing. Some very embarrassing footage leaked.

Legal fallout: Class action lawsuit. Criminal investigations. Founders faced charges.

Lesson learned: Privacy marketing without security engineering is fraud. WebRTC doesn't automatically mean secure.

What went wrong: Assumed "peer-to-peer = secure." Forgot about authentication, authorization, access control.

The cryptocurrency that wasn't

2018. ICO (Initial Coin Offering). "Decentralized video platform" built on "revolutionary WebRTC blockchain."

The pitch: WebRTC for video. Blockchain for payment. Decentralized. Revolutionary.

The reality: Barely functional demo. WebRTC connections failing constantly. "Blockchain" was MySQL database.

Funds raised: $8 million

Actual product: Broken video chat with cryptocurrency buzzwords.

What investors got: Nothing. Founders disappeared with money.

The technical nonsense:

• "WebRTC blockchain" (makes no sense)
• "Peer-to-peer means decentralized" (not the same thing)
• "Can't be shut down" (signaling server was single point of failure)

Lesson learned: Buzzword soup doesn't build products. Due diligence matters. If it sounds too good to be true...

SEC involvement: Investigation. Charges filed. Money never recovered.

Common themes in WebRTC failures

Overconfidence: "How hard can it be?" (Famous last words)

Underestimating complexity: Looks simple in demos. Production is different.

Ignoring networking realities: Firewalls exist. NAT exists. Internet is imperfect.

Security oversights: Forgetting authentication, encryption isn't everything, privacy implications.

Cost surprises: TURN servers aren't free. Bandwidth adds up fast.

Scaling assumptions: What works for 10 users fails for 100. What works for 100 fails for 1000.

What these failures teach us

1. Test in realistic conditions

Not just your laptop on office WiFi. Test corporate networks, bad connections, mobile, firewalls.

2. Budget for infrastructure

TURN servers cost money. Signaling servers cost money. Bandwidth costs money. Plan accordingly.

3. Security isn't optional

Authentication. Authorization. Privacy. Legal compliance. Get experts involved.

4. Understand the architecture

Mesh vs SFU vs MCU. Peer-to-peer implications. Scaling limitations. Know before building.

5. Read the damn documentation

Libraries have limitations. Services have terms. Protocols have requirements. RTFM.

6. Have rollback plans

When (not if) things go wrong, how do you recover? Monitoring. Alerts. Fallbacks.

7. Don't lie in marketing

"Privacy-focused" means actually securing it. "Enterprise-ready" means actually scaling. Words have meaning.

The bottom line

WebRTC is powerful. Also complex. Also has sharp edges.

Every spectacular failure came from:

• Underestimating complexity
• Skipping security review
• Not testing thoroughly
• Ignoring best practices
• Overselling capabilities

The good news: These are all preventable. People have made these mistakes so you don't have to.

The bad news: People keep making them anyway.

Learn from these failures. They're expensive lessons someone else paid for. Don't pay them again.

WebRTC will let you build amazing things. It will also let you build disasters. The difference is thinking through implications before shipping.

Because there's no "undo" button after your company becomes a cautionary tale.

---

Built responsibly: NotesQR uses WebRTC with proper security and infrastructure.

Questions? Connect on LinkedIn or X.com.