← Back to Blog

The Wedding That Almost Didn't Happen (And How WebRTC Saved It)

The Wedding That Almost Didn't Happen (And How WebRTC Saved It)
November 25, 2025NotesQR Team

March 2020. Sarah and Mike had been planning their wedding for 18 months. 200 guests. Destination venue. Dream day approaching.

Then COVID-19 shut down the world.

The impossible choice

Cancel and lose deposits? Postpone indefinitely with no guarantee? Or do something crazy?

Sarah's grandmother was 89. In poor health. Might not be around for a postponement. Mike's brother was deployed overseas couldn't come home even if they waited.

They couldn't wait. But they couldn't have a traditional wedding either.

The "virtual wedding" nightmare

First attempt: Zoom wedding. Free account with 40-minute limit.

What happened:

  • Ceremony started
  • 20 minutes in, grandmother's connection dropped
  • She missed the vows
  • Call cut off at 40 minutes
  • Had to restart, send new link
  • Half the guests couldn't rejoin

The bride cried. Not the happy tears.

The tech-savvy friend

Mike's college roommate, a developer, had an idea. He'd been experimenting with WebRTC for a work project.

"What if we build something custom? Direct connections, no time limits, no random disconnections?"

They had 10 days until the wedding.

Building a wedding platform in 10 days

Working nights and weekends, Mike's friend built a custom platform:

Features they needed:

  • Video from the venue to all guests
  • Way for guests to see each other (virtual reception)
  • Picture slideshow
  • Toast recordings
  • Guest book with video messages

Using WebRTC meant:

  • Better video quality than Zoom
  • No time limits
  • Lower latency (more natural conversation)
  • Could customize everything for wedding theme

Wedding day

Saturday morning. 200 guests logged in from 15 countries.

The setup:

  • Venue had two cameras (bride/groom and wide shot)
  • Guests watched on computers, tablets, phones
  • Virtual "reception tables" where groups could chat
  • Grandmother got her own private "front row" connection

The ceremony:

Grandmother watched in real-time. When Sarah walked down the aisle, she could see her granddaughter's face clearly. No lag. No frozen video.

When they said "I do," guests erupted in applause in their own homes. The couple heard it through speakers at the venue slightly chaotic but beautiful.

Mike's brother from deployment tuned in. Clear video despite being halfway around the world. He gave a toast in real-time. Not a recording actual live participation.

What made it special

It wasn't perfect. A few connections dropped. Some guests struggled with technology. Uncle Bob never figured out how to unmute.

But it worked. The couple got married. Loved ones witnessed it. Grandmother saw her granddaughter get married. Brother participated from deployment.

The unexpected benefit: The recording was crystal clear. Better quality than most wedding videos. They have the full ceremony, every toast, every speech all in high quality.

Why it mattered beyond one wedding

That day, the developer friend realized something: thousands of couples faced the same problem.

He polished the platform. Added features. Launched it as a product.

Over the next year:

  • 500+ couples used it for COVID weddings
  • Elderly relatives could attend safely
  • Deployed service members participated
  • International families connected
  • People who couldn't travel watched anyway

One couple had 50 in-person guests and 400 virtual. Another did fully virtual with 1,000 guests. Parents used it for their 50th anniversary vow renewal.

The accidental innovation

Before COVID, virtual weddings seemed sad. A consolation prize for people who couldn't do it "right."

After COVID, people realized: maybe it's not sad. Maybe it's inclusive.

Now, even with in-person weddings back:

Some couples still offer virtual attendance:

  • Elderly relatives who can't travel
  • Friends who live far away
  • People who can't afford flights
  • Immunocompromised family members
  • Anyone who can't make it but wants to participate

It's not replacement it's addition.

What Sarah and Mike say now

"Our wedding wasn't what we planned. But looking back, it might have been better.

Grandmother got to attend. She passed away six months later. If we'd postponed, she wouldn't have seen it.

Mike's brother was there from deployment. In-person might have meant he missed it.

Aunt from Australia who never travels she was there. Cousins with new babies who couldn't fly they were there.

We had 200 people at our wedding. If we'd done traditional in-person only, we'd have had maybe 100. COVID forced us to include more people, not fewer.

Yeah, it was weird having people in boxes on screens. But it was also beautiful. Everyone we loved witnessed our marriage. That's what mattered."

The technical side (briefly)

Why did WebRTC work where Zoom didn't?

Custom solution meant:

  • No artificial time limits
  • Better quality (direct connections)
  • Customized for specific needs
  • Could prioritize certain connections (grandmother got best quality)
  • Matched wedding colors/theme
  • Features specific to weddings

Zoom is great for meetings. But weddings aren't meetings. They need different things.

Other stories from that year

The graduation: 500 students graduating virtually. WebRTC let them do it with minimal lag, better quality than university's Zoom plan allowed.

The funeral: Family couldn't attend in person. Virtual attendance meant distant relatives could say goodbye.

The birth announcement: New parents did virtual "meet the baby" for overseas grandparents. Better than photos grandparents could coo at baby in real-time.

The proposal: Guy proposed to girlfriend, surprised her with virtual attendance from her parents (who lived abroad). They saw her reaction live, not in a recording later.

What we learned

Technology can't replace being there. But it's a hell of a lot better than not participating at all.

Virtual isn't second-rate. It's different. Sometimes that different is actually better for inclusion.

WebRTC's low latency matters. When Grandma says "you look beautiful" and the bride hears it in real-time, that's special. A 10-second delay? Not the same.

Custom solutions sometimes beat mainstream tools. Zoom is great for work meetings. But for once-in-a-lifetime events, specialized tools matter.

The bigger picture

COVID forced innovation. Not because people wanted to because they had to.

Some innovations were terrible. Virtual happy hours? Nobody misses those.

But some stuck around. Virtual wedding attendance. Remote family gatherings. Long-distance participation in important moments.

Because it turns out: the technology to connect people in meaningful ways existed. We just never thought to use it that way.

WebRTC was invented for video calls and file sharing. Nobody planned for it to save weddings. But when people needed it, it was there.

For anyone planning events now

Don't think virtual OR in-person. Think both.

Have a wedding? Great. Also stream it for people who can't attend.

Graduation? Concert? Birthday party? Whatever it is consider hybrid.

Not because COVID might come back. Because life happens. People get sick. Flights get cancelled. Money is tight. Distance is real.

Making events accessible to people who can't physically attend isn't settling. It's expanding your celebration to include more people you love.

The bottom line

Sarah and Mike's wedding wasn't the fairy tale they planned. It was the fairy tale they needed.

Technology didn't make it perfect. But it made it possible.

And five years later, when they watch their wedding video and see grandmother's face light up as Sarah walked down the aisle, they don't think "we settled for virtual."

They think: "We're so grateful she got to see this."

Sometimes, the unexpected path leads somewhere beautiful.


For your own special moments: NotesQR uses WebRTC for secure, direct connections.

Questions? Connect on LinkedIn or X.com.

The Wedding That Almost Didn't Happen (And How WebRTC Saved It) - NotesQR Blog