Remember when working from home meant "just use Zoom"? That was simple. But now, three years into the remote work revolution, some teams are asking: is there a better way?

Turns out, there might be. And it involves WebRTC the technology that powers direct connections between people without everything going through company servers.

The problem with traditional video calls

You're in a meeting. Twelve people on the call. Everyone's video is going through Zoom's (or Teams', or Meet's) servers. That means:

Your video goes: You → Zoom servers → Everyone else

Everyone's video comes back: Them → Zoom servers → You

Every frame of video, every word spoken, every screen share it all flows through their servers. And you're paying them, monthly, for that privilege.

How WebRTC changes the game

With WebRTC-based tools, video goes directly between participants:

You → Directly to your coworkers

No middleman. No server processing every frame. No company watching your bandwidth usage and charging accordingly.

It's like the difference between:

• Traditional: Everyone talking through walkie-talkies controlled by a central operator
• WebRTC: Everyone on a conference call talking directly to each other

Real benefits for remote teams

Better video quality

When you're not routing through distant servers, video quality improves. Less compression, less lag, clearer picture.

That moment when someone says "Can you hear me?" and everyone's video freezes? Happens less often with direct connections.

Actually private meetings

When discussing sensitive information salaries, company strategy, client details do you want it flowing through someone else's servers?

With WebRTC, it doesn't. The call goes directly between participants. Even if someone intercepted it (very difficult), it's encrypted end-to-end.

No surprise bills

Traditional video tools charge per user, per month. Plus extra for features. Plus overage fees if you go over time limits or participant limits.

WebRTC-based tools often charge flat rates or much lower per-user costs because they're not paying massive infrastructure bills to process everyone's video.

Works when the internet is wonky

Direct connections adapt better to poor internet. Instead of your video going across the country to a server and back, it goes straight to your coworkers often much shorter distances.

Bad connection? The call degrades gracefully instead of cutting out entirely.

Real teams, real results

Small design agency (8 people)

Before: Zoom, $240/month, laggy calls with clients

After: WebRTC-based tool, $50/month, clearer calls, happier clients

Bonus: Client presentations don't require uploading huge design files to share screens direct connection handles it smoothly.

Remote startup (25 people)

Before: Google Meet, constant "can you hear me?", frozen video

After: Self-hosted WebRTC solution, rock-solid calls, complete privacy

Trade-off: Required technical setup initially, but now runs itself.

Consulting firm (50 people)

Before: Microsoft Teams, $600/month, okay quality

After: Hybrid approach Teams for chat, WebRTC for video calls with clients

Result: Better client experience, lower costs, more professional appearance.

The honest downsides

Not as plug-and-play. Zoom is stupid easy click link, join call. WebRTC tools can require more setup, especially for non-technical users.

Fewer features (sometimes). Zoom has virtual backgrounds, noise cancellation, recording, transcription, breakout rooms, and a million other features. Some WebRTC tools are more bare-bones.

Everyone needs decent internet. With Zoom, their servers can help smooth out bad connections. With direct WebRTC, if someone has terrible internet, everyone feels it.

Firewall headaches. Some corporate firewalls block peer-to-peer connections. This means IT needs to configure things properly (or calls won't work).

When WebRTC makes sense for your team

You care about privacy

• Discussing sensitive client information
• Handling confidential business matters
• Just don't like companies having access to everything

You're budget-conscious

• Paying for Zoom/Teams adds up fast
• Small team that doesn't need enterprise features
• Want to reduce recurring costs

You have basic technical capability

• Someone on the team can handle initial setup
• Comfortable with slightly more technical tools
• IT person or tech-savvy founder available

Video quality matters

• Client-facing calls where impressions count
• Presentations where lag is unacceptable
• International team where server routing adds latency

When to stick with Zoom/Teams

You need enterprise features

• Webinars with hundreds of people
• Advanced recording and transcription
• Integration with enterprise software
• Extensive admin controls

You have non-technical users

• Team members who struggle with technology
• Clients who just want to "click and join"
• No one available to provide tech support

You need it to "just work"

• No time to troubleshoot
• Can't afford any downtime
• Prefer paying for guaranteed reliability

The hybrid approach

Many teams don't go all-in on WebRTC. Instead:

Use Zoom/Teams for:

• Large all-hands meetings
• Webinars and presentations
• Client calls with non-technical clients
• Screen recording for training

Use WebRTC for:

• Daily team standups
• One-on-one calls
• Sensitive discussions
• Calls with technically-capable clients

Best of both worlds convenience when you need it, privacy and cost savings when it matters.

Popular WebRTC tools to try

Jitsi Meet (free, open source)

• Host your own or use their free service
• No account needed to join
• Basic but solid

Daily.co (paid, easy)

• Built for developers
• Easy to embed in your own apps
• Good middle ground between DIY and Zoom

Whereby (paid, user-friendly)

• Browser-based, no downloads
• Personal meeting rooms
• Very simple interface

Self-hosted options

• For teams with IT capability
• Complete control and privacy
• Requires technical setup

Making the switch

Don't rush it. Try WebRTC tools alongside your current solution. Run parallel for a month. See what works.

Start with internal meetings. Test with your own team before inflicting experiments on clients.

Have a backup plan. Keep your Zoom account active for a while. Some calls will need the fallback option.

Train your team. Even simple tools need explanation. Do a quick training session so everyone knows what they're doing.

Gather feedback. What works? What's annoying? What's missing? Adjust based on actual use.

The bottom line

WebRTC isn't magic. It won't solve all your remote work problems. But for the right teams, it offers:

• Better privacy
• Lower costs
• Often better quality
• More control

Is it worth switching from Zoom? Depends on your priorities.

If you value: Convenience, enterprise features, zero hassle → Stick with traditional tools

If you value: Privacy, cost savings, video quality, control → Explore WebRTC options

Remote work is evolving. The tools we use should evolve too. WebRTC might be that evolution or it might be a niche solution for specific needs.

Either way, it's worth understanding your options. You might be surprised what works better for your team.

---

Try WebRTC yourself: NotesQR uses WebRTC for direct, secure transfers.

Questions? Connect on LinkedIn or X.com.